Anesthesia Machines in Nursing Practice: Equipment Safety, Perioperative Monitoring, and Clinical Competency
Abstract
Background: Modern anesthesia machines have evolved into integrated workstations that deliver inhaled anesthetics, oxygenation, and ventilation while incorporating advanced safety mechanisms. Their complexity demands thorough understanding by anesthesiologists and perioperative teams to prevent adverse events.
Aim: This article aims to review the functional design, gas flow dynamics, critical components, safety systems, and interprofessional practices essential for safe anesthesia machine operation.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review and synthesis of engineering principles, clinical guidelines, and perioperative safety standards were conducted. Key topics include pressure systems, circle breathing circuits, vaporizer technology, CO₂ absorption, and occupational hazard mitigation.
Results: Modern anesthesia machines integrate high-, intermediate-, and low-pressure systems to regulate gas delivery and maintain patient safety. Circle systems enable low-flow anesthesia, reducing environmental pollution and cost, but increase vulnerability to leaks. Critical components—vaporizers, APL valve, oxygen flush, and CO₂ absorbent—require vigilant monitoring. Safety mechanisms such as PISS, DISS, flowmeter sequencing, scavenging systems, and hypoxia prevention strategies reduce catastrophic risks. Interprofessional interventions, including backup ventilation readiness, leak surveillance, and structured communication, significantly enhance patient and staff safety.
Conclusion: Safe anesthesia delivery depends on mastery of machine mechanics, adherence to pre-use checks, and collaborative vigilance. Despite automation, human factors remain the leading cause of critical incidents, underscoring the need for continuous education and teamwork.
Full text article
References
Patil VP, Shetmahajan MG, Divatia JV. The modern integrated anaesthesia workstation. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2013 Sep:57(5):446-54. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.120139.
Gurudatt C. The basic anaesthesia machine. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2013 Sep:57(5):438-45. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.120138.
Subrahmanyam M, Mohan S. Safety features in anaesthesia machine. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2013 Sep:57(5):472-80. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.120143.
Upadya M, Saneesh PJ. Low-flow anaesthesia - underused mode towards "sustainable anaesthesia". Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2018 Mar:62(3):166-172. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_413_17.
Chakravarti S, Basu S. Modern anaesthesia vapourisers. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2013 Sep:57(5):464-71. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.120142.
Kharasch ED, Powers KM, Artru AA. Comparison of Amsorb, sodalime, and Baralyme degradation of volatile anesthetics and formation of carbon monoxide and compound a in swine in vivo. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jan:96(1):173-82
Goneppanavar U, Prabhu M. Anaesthesia machine: checklist, hazards, scavenging. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2013 Sep:57(5):533-40. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.120151.
Kaul TK, Mittal G. Mapleson's Breathing Systems. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2013 Sep:57(5):507-15. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.120148.
Al Suhaibani M, Al Malki A, Al Dosary S, Al Barmawi H, Pogoku M. Pre-use anesthesia machine check; certified anesthesia technician based quality improvement audit. Anesthesia, essays and researches. 2014 Sep-Dec:8(3):354-60. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143142.
Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Westpphal K. Occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics: epidemiology and approaches to reducing the problem. CNS drugs. 2001:15(3):197-215
Yılmaz S, Çalbayram NÇ. Exposure to anesthetic gases among operating room personnel and risk of genotoxicity: A systematic review of the human biomonitoring studies. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2016 Dec:35():326-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.029.
Nagella AB, Ravishankar M, Hemanth Kumar VR. Anaesthesia practice and reproductive outcomes: Facts unveiled. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2015 Nov:59(11):706-14. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.170028.
McIntyre JW. Anesthesia equipment malfunction: origins and clinical recognition. Canadian Medical Association journal. 1979 Apr 21:120(8):931-4
Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Kitz RJ. An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology. 1984 Jan:60(1):34-42
Jin L, Baillie TA, Davis MR, Kharasch ED. Nephrotoxicity of sevoflurane compound A [fluoromethyl-2,2-difluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl)vinyl ether] in rats: evidence for glutathione and cysteine conjugate formation and the role of renal cysteine conjugate beta-lyase. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1995 May 16:210(2):498-506
Lee BH, Chan JT, Hazarika O, Vutskits L, Sall JW. Early exposure to volatile anesthetics impairs long-term associative learning and recognition memory. PloS one. 2014:9(8):e105340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105340.
Ong Sio LCL, Dela Cruz RGC, Bautista AF. Sevoflurane and renal function: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Medical gas research. 2017 Jul-Sep:7(3):186-193. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.215748.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Faris Saad Alghamdi, Munirah Jayiz Alruwaili, Osama Faraj Shalih Alotaibi, Ibtisam Azzam Ali Bahkali, Ohud Awaji Yahyia Hakami, Amal Ali Ahmed Aofiany, Mazin Mohammed S Shkar, Abdulelah Saud Hamad Alzunaytan, Abduallaziz Jarallah Obied Alenzi, Boshra Obaid Rhil Alanazi, Rauf Fahad Mohammed Hawbani, Nourah Abdullah Ali Alslole, Nouf Saad Kurdi Alanazi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
