Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)

Date Log

Submitted
July 19, 2025
Published
December 25, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 IBRAHIM SALEH AYED ALSHARARI, ABDULLAH MUBARAK DULAYMAN ALSHARARI ALSHARARI, FARES SALAMEH H ALSHARARI ALSHARARI

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Quality Control of Laboratory Medicine: Preventing Errors for Diagnostic Reliability

https://doi.org/10.64483/20251127
IBRAHIM SALEH AYED ALSHARARI
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al-Jouf Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia
ABDULLAH MUBARAK DULAYMAN ALSHARARI ALSHARARI
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al-Jouf Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia
FARES SALAMEH H ALSHARARI ALSHARARI
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al-Jouf Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia

Corresponding Author(s) : IBRAHIM SALEH AYED ALSHARARI

iasharari@moh.gov.sa

Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)

Abstract

Quality assurance (QA) of laboratory medicine is vital for diagnostic reliability and patient safety. Laboratory test errors can lead to misdiagnoses, inappropriate therapy or treatments, and unwanted outcomes. This systematic review discusses and integrates quality laboratory medicine error prevention in the context of diagnostic reliability, based on 46 peer-reviewed articles. It discusses the preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases of error prevention based on the nature, source, and ways to avoid errors, different QA models, approaches with new technology, a variety of ways to train or educate, and continuous improvement. The laboratory medicine errors are routine: wrong sample, analytical errors, and wrong result, and the inclusion of preanalytical errors causes the majority of errors (preanalytical errors are as high as 70%). QA models (for example, ISO 15189) offer an all-encompassing model; newer technological approaches (automation, artificial intelligence, etc.) offer an alternative with increased accuracy. The technical impediments to implementing quality management systems to prevent errors and monitor quality are scarce resources and a lack of educational/ training experience, and experience makes it more difficult for lower-resource centers or settings. Some recommendations include: effective management, testing protocols that are standardized, external quality assessment, and interprofessional working. The priorities for future agendas are considering new technology as it evolves, international harmonization of standards (decreased variability), and reducing inequities in access to laboratory testing. The review provides evidence for quality assurance systems that will lead to error reduction, diagnostically dependable outcomes, and outcome maximization for patients, with the result being quality improvement for the delivered healthcare will be laboratory professionals

Keywords

Quality assurance, laboratory medicine, diagnostic error, patient safety, automation
ALSHARARI, I. S. A., ALSHARARI, A. M. D. A., & ALSHARARI, F. S. H. A. (2024). Quality Control of Laboratory Medicine: Preventing Errors for Diagnostic Reliability. Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 1(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.64483/20251127
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Agyeman, Y. O., et al. (2023). Barriers to delivery of culturally competent care among nurses: A multi-center cross-sectional study in a resource-limited setting. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 34(4), 462-469.
  2. Baron, J. M., et al. (2010). The impact of laboratory information systems on patient safety and quality. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 134(7), 1003-1008.
  3. Bates, D. W., & Singh, H. (2018). Two decades since to err is human: An assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1736-1743.
  4. Carraro, P., & Plebani, M. (2007). Errors in a stat laboratory: Types and frequencies 10 years later. Clinical Chemistry, 53(7), 1338-1342.
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2016). Quality management systems: A model for laboratory services. CLSI guideline QMS01-A4.
  6. Epner, P. L., et al. (2013). Improving the diagnostic process: The role of laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 59(10), 1424-1429.
  7. Fonjungo, P. N., et al. (2017). Laboratory medicine in Africa: A barrier to effective health care. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 64(5), 583-589.
  8. Gras, J. M., & Philippe, M. (2007). Application of the Six Sigma concept in clinical laboratories: A review. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 45(6), 789-796.
  9. Hammerling, J. A. (2012). A review of medical errors in laboratory diagnostics and where we are today. Laboratory Medicine, 43(2), 41-44.
  10. Hawker, C. D. (2017). Barcode technology in the clinical laboratory: Benefits and challenges. Clinical Biochemistry, 50(12), 675-681.
  11. International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO 15189:2012 Medical laboratories—Requirements for quality and competence. https://www.iso.org/standard/56115.html
  12. Lippi, G., et al. (2011). Preanalytical quality improvement: From dream to reality. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 49(7), 1113-1120.
  13. Lippi, G., et al. (2017). Preanalytical variability: The dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 55(7), 913-920.
  14. Nkengasong, J. N., et al. (2010). Laboratory systems and services are critical in global health: Time to end the neglect? American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 134(3), 368-373.
  15. Plebani, M. (2010). The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 47(2), 101-110.
  16. Plebani, M., & Lippi, G. (2010). To err is human: To misdiagnose might be deadly. Clinical Biochemistry, 43(1-2), 1-3.
  17. Price, C. P., & Christenson, R. H. (2019). Advances in point-of-care testing. Clinical Biochemistry, 67, 1-7.
  18. Rajkomar, A., et al. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347-1358.
  19. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768-770.
  20. Sampson, M. L., et al. (2014). Simulation-based training in laboratory medicine: Enhancing quality assurance skills. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 67(10), 901-906.
  21. Sayeed, Y., et al. (2020). Challenges in delivering quality laboratory services in resource-limited settings. African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 9(1), a1053.
  22. Sciacovelli, L., et al. (2010). External quality assessment: An effective tool for clinical governance in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 48(7), 943-949.
  23. Sciacovelli, L., et al. (2018). Performance specifications in laboratory medicine: The need for a patient-centered approach. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 56(4), 509-514.
  24. Slobodin, O., et al. (2021). Online training and cultural competence: A pre- and post-intervention study. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 32(5), 512-519.
  25. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.
  26. Westgard, J. O. (2003). Six Sigma quality management in clinical laboratories. Clinical Chemistry, 49(8), 1231-1233.
  27. Westgard, J. O., & Westgard, S. A. (2014). Quality control in the age of automation. Clinical Chemistry, 60(1), 54-60.
  28. World Health Organization. (2011). Laboratory quality management system: Handbook. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548274
  29. AACC. (2021). Quality assurance in clinical chemistry: Current practices and future directions. Clinical Chemistry, 67(1), 10-18.
  30. Allen, L. C. (2013). Role of laboratory information systems in quality assurance. Journal of Medical Systems, 37(3), 9948.
  31. Bonini, P., et al. (2002). Errors in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 48(5), 691-698.
  32. Boyd, J. C. (2015). Statistical methods for quality control in clinical laboratories. Clinical Biochemistry Reviews, 36(3), 77-85.
  33. Braga, F., & Panteghini, M. (2014). Verification of in vitro medical diagnostics: Can we learn from other disciplines? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 52(11), 1531-1536.
  34. Ceriotti, F. (2017). Harmonization in laboratory medicine: The complete picture. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 55(7), 921-927.
  35. Hammerling, J. A. (2015). A review of preanalytical errors in laboratory diagnostics. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 29(5), 351-357.
  36. Jansen, R. T., et al. (2013). Quality assurance in clinical chemistry: A European perspective. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 51(8), 1553-1560.
  37. Lippi, G., & Simundic, A. M. (2012). Total quality in laboratory diagnostics: The role of the preanalytical phase. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 288-292.
  38. Plebani, M. (2006). Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 44(6), 750-759.
  39. Plebani, M. (2012). Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: A fundamental tool for quality and patient safety. Clinical Biochemistry, 45(15), 1170-1174.
  40. Plebani, M., et al. (2014). Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 52(11), 1655-1661.
  41. Plebani, M., et al. (2015). Quality indicators for the total testing process. Clinical Biochemistry Reviews, 36(2), 37-46.
  42. Sciacovelli, L., & Plebani, M. (2009). The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clinica Chimica Acta, 404(1), 79-85.
  43. Simundic, A. M., & Lippi, G. (2012). Preanalytical phase—A continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochemia Medica, 22(2), 145-149.
  44. Westgard, J. O. (2010). Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 48(1), 31-40.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1140 Download : 624