Role of Inhaled Therapies in COPD Progression and Exacerbation Prevention: A Critical Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64483/jmph-64Keywords:
COPD, inhaled therapy, LAMA, LABA, ICS, triple therapy, exacerbation, eosinophilic, ACOS, FDC, MABA.Abstract
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management lacks universal consensus on triple inhaled therapy, comprising a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), a long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA), and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Current guidelines, such as GOLD, primarily reserve triple therapy for very severe cases (Group D), while other international guidelines advocate for broader use, including in patients with frequent exacerbations or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS). This divergence leads to varied real-world prescribing practices, often driven by clinical empiricism rather than strict phenotypic stratification. Emerging evidence suggests therapeutic advantages in specific subgroups, such as those with ACOS, eosinophilic inflammation, or a history of frequent exacerbations, who may benefit from intensified bronchodilator treatment.
Aim: This review aims to critically examine the rationale for triple inhaled therapy in COPD by integrating data from various clinical trials, exploring its clinical effectiveness and safety profiles, and considering future trends in COPD management.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, synthesizing data from clinical trials investigating the simultaneous use of LAMA, LABA, and ICS. The review focused on the pharmacologic rationale, anti-inflammatory effects, and evidence from key clinical trials, including studies on fixed-dose combinations and novel pharmacological approaches. Safety considerations, particularly regarding pneumonia risk and mortality, were also examined.
Results: Triple inhaled therapy demonstrates synergistic bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory effects, particularly beneficial in patients with high exacerbation risk, eosinophilic inflammation, or poor symptom control. Clinical trials show improvements in lung function and reductions in exacerbations, though the universal benefit is debated. ICS withdrawal may be feasible in select patients without compromising exacerbation control. Fixed-dose combinations enhance adherence and convenience. Safety concerns include increased pneumonia risk with ICS, especially fluticasone, and historical mortality signals with tiotropium Respimat®, though large trials have largely allayed these concerns. Novel bifunctional molecules like MABAs and PDE4 inhibitors are emerging, offering potential for improved efficacy and simplified regimens.
Conclusion: Triple inhaled therapy is a valuable option for specific COPD phenotypes, emphasizing the need for personalized medicine. Future research should focus on identifying biomarkers for ICS responsiveness and assessing long-term safety. Optimal use depends on robust clinical evidence tailored to diverse patient populations.
References
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). (2024). Global strategy for the prevention, diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2024 report. https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report-2/
Rabe, K. F., Watz, H., Baraldo, S., Pedersen, F., Schmidt, H., & Bals, R. (2023). Triple therapy in COPD: When, for whom, and why? The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 11(3), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00399-9
Vestbo, J., & Vogelmeier, C. F. (2022). Pharmacological treatment of COPD: From evidence to implementation. European Respiratory Review, 31(166), 210144. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0144-2021
Rogers, D. F., & Donnelly, L. E. (2020). Inhaled corticosteroids: Risks and benefits in COPD. European Respiratory Journal, 55(2), 1901041. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01041-2019
Lipson, D. A., Barnhart, F., Brealey, N., Brooks, J., Criner, G. J., Day, N. C., … & Pascoe, S. J. (2018). Once-daily single-inhaler triple versus dual therapy in patients with COPD. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(18), 1671–1680. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713901
Cazzola, M., Rogliani, P., Matera, M. G., & Hanania, N. A. (2020). The future of inhaled therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Looking beyond the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combination. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 202(11), 1490–1498. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202004-0997PP
Agustí, A., & Hogg, J. C. (2019). Update on the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(13), 1248–1256. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1900475
Montuschi, P., & Ciabattoni, G. (2015). Bronchodilating drugs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Current status and future trends. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 58(10), 4131-4164.
Montuschi, P., et al. (2013). Inhaled muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists for treatment of COPD. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 20(11), 1464-1476.
Kume, H., et al. (2015). Research and development of bronchodilators for asthma and COPD with a focus on G protein/KCa channel linkage and β2-adrenergic intrinsic efficacy. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 156, 75-89.
Pera, T., & Penn, R. B. (2014). Crosstalk between β2-adrenoceptor and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the airway. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 16, 72-81.
Belmonte, K. E. (2005). Cholinergic pathways in the lungs and anticholinergic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2(4), 297-304.
Brown, S. M., et al. (2013). A role for M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in the contraction of rat and human small airways. European Journal of Pharmacology, 702(1-3), 109-115.
Hoonhorst, S. J., et al. (2014). Steroid resistance in COPD? Overlap and differential anti-inflammatory effects in smokers and ex-smokers. PLoS One, 9(1), e87443.
Jiang, Z., & Zhu, L. (2016). Update on molecular mechanisms of corticosteroid resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 37, 1-8.
Pavord, I. D., et al. (2016). Blood eosinophils and inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist efficacy in COPD. Thorax, 71(2), 118-125.
Barnes, P. J. (2013). Corticosteroid resistance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 131(3), 636-645.
.Ito, K., et al. (2005). Decreased histone deacetylase activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(19), 1967-1976.
Aaron, S. D., et al. (2007). Tiotropium in combination with placebo, salmeterol, or fluticasone-salmeterol for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(8), 545-555.
Welte, T., et al. (2009). Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 180(8), 741-750.
Magnussen, H., et al. (2014). Withdrawal of inhaled glucocorticoids and exacerbations of COPD. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(14), 1285-1294.
Siler, T. M., et al. (2015). Efficacy and safety of umeclidinium added to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with COPD: Results of two randomized, double-blind studies. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 13(1), 1-10.
Pleasants, R. A., et al. (2016). Inhaled umeclidinium in COPD patients: A review and meta-analysis. Drugs, 76(3), 343-361.
Scott, L. J., & Hair, P. (2014). Umeclidinium/vilanterol: First global approval. Drugs, 74(3), 389-395.
Syed, Y. Y. (2015). Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol: A review of its use in patients with asthma. Drugs, 75(4), 407-418.
McKeage, K. (2014). Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol: A review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drugs, 74(13), 1509-1522.
Biggadike, K., et al. (2008). X-ray crystal structure of the novel enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid agonist fluticasone furoate in the glucocorticoid receptor-ligand binding domain. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 51(11), 3349-3352.
Valotis, A., & Högger, P. (2007). Human receptor kinetics and lung tissue retention of the enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid fluticasone furoate. Respiratory Research, 8(1), 54.
Bollmeier, S. G., & Prosser, T. R. (2014). Combination of fluticasone furoate and vilanterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 48(2), 250-257.
Brealey, N., et al. (2016). Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol as a triple therapy in healthy volunteers. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 53(9), 753-764.
Calverley, P. M., et al. (2007). Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(8), 775-789.
Crim, C., et al. (2015). Pneumonia risk with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol compared with vilanterol alone in patients with COPD. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 12(1), 27-34.
Suissa, S., et al. (2013). Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD and the risk of serious pneumonia. Thorax, 68(11), 1029-1036.
Singh, S., et al. (2011). Mortality associated with tiotropium mist inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 342, d3215.
Dong, Y. H., et al. (2013). Comparative safety of inhaled medications in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Thorax, 68(1), 48-56.
Wise, R. A., et al. (2023). Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(16), 1491-1501.
Loke, Y. K., et al. (2014). Tiotropium and the risk of death in COPD. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(5), 480-481.
Hughes, A. D., et al. (2015). Discovery of (R)-1-(3-((2-chloro-4-(((2-hydroxy-2-(8-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinolin-5-yl)ethyl)amino)methyl)-5-methoxyphenyl)amino)-3-oxopropyl)piperidin-4-yl [1,1′-biphenyl]-2-ylcarbamate (TD-5959, GSK961081, batefenterol): First-in-class dual pharmacology multivalent muscarinic antagonist and β-agonist (MABA) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 58(6), 2609-2622.
.Jones, L. H., et al. (2015). Molecular hybridization yields triazole bronchodilators for the treatment of COPD. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 25(22), 5121-5126.
Vehring, R., et al. (2012). Cosuspensions of microcrystals and engineered microparticles for uniform and efficient delivery of respiratory therapeutics from pressurized metered dose inhalers. Langmuir, 28(43), 15015-15023.
Bateman, E. D., et al. (2013). Pharmacodynamics of GSK961081, a bi-functional molecule, in patients with COPD. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 26(5), 581-587.
Norris, V., & Ambery, C. (2013). Bronchodilation and safety of supratherapeutic doses of salbutamol or ipratropium bromide added to single dose GSK961081 in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 26(5), 574-580.
Hedge, S. S., et al. (2014). Pharmacologic characterization of GSK-961081 (TD-5959), a first-in-class inhaled bifunctional bronchodilator possessing muscarinic receptor antagonist and β2-adrenoceptor agonist properties. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 351(1), 190-199.
Norris, V., et al. (2014). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GSK961081, a novel inhaled muscarinic antagonist β2-agonist, and fluticasone propionate administered alone, concurrently and as a combination blend formulation in healthy volunteers. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development, 3(4), 305-313.
Tannheimer, S. L., et al. (2014). The in vitro pharmacology of GS-5759, a novel bifunctional phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor and long acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 349(1), 85-93.
Salmon, M., et al. (2014). The in vivo efficacy and side effect pharmacology of GS-5759, a novel bifunctional phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor and long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist in preclinical animal species. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, 2(1), e00046.
Barnes, P. J. (2010). Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: A controversy. Respiration, 80(2), 89-95.
Van Tho, N., et al. (2015). A mixed phenotype of airway wall thickening and emphysema is associated with dyspnea and hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 12(7), 988-996.
Hurst, J. R., et al. (2010). Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(12), 1128-1138.
Russell, D. W., et al. (2016). Disease phenotyping in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The neutrophilic endotype. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 22(2), 91-99.
Kim, S., et al. (2015). Integrative phenotyping framework (iPF): Integrative clustering of multiple omics data identifies novel lung disease subphenotypes. BMC Genomics, 16(1), 924.
Shaw, D. E., et al. (2015). Clinical and inflammatory characteristics of the European U-BIOPRED adult severe asthma cohort. European Respiratory Journal, 46(5), 1308-1321.
Beier, J., et al. (2013). Efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide compared with placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Results from a 6-week, randomized, controlled Phase IIIb study. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 10(4), 511-522.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ziyad Tariq Alluqman, Hussain Abdullah Almutawah, Aqeelah Ebrahem Emwees

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.